Difference in contagious yawning between susceptible men and women: why not?

In sum, the sample of articles on human contagious yawning that Gallup & Massen used to conclude
that our result is a false positive is incorrect, because the cited articles cannot be reliably compared
with our study. The comparative studies considering non-human animals were used to discuss why
it is reasonable to interpret the different types of biases in contagious yawning in the light of the role
that the individuals play in their social groups. Finally, not to replicate previously published results, we
focused on the subjects that showed yawn contagion and we made sure that the eliciting stimulus was
perceived. In our study, we found that women produce slightly more yawns than men (moderate effect
size) and that gender plays a statistically significant role in susceptible people, with women showing a
higher level of yawn contagion than men.We are confident that future studies will confirm our results.

Publication type: 
Articolo
Author or Creator: 
Norscia, Ivan
Demuru, Elisa
Palagi, Elisabetta
Publisher: 
Royal Society, Regno Unito, Regno Unito
Source: 
Royal society open science 3 (2016). doi:10.1098/rsos.160477
info:cnr-pdr/source/autori:Norscia, Ivan; Demuru, Elisa; Palagi, Elisabetta/titolo:Difference in contagious yawning between susceptible men and women: why not?/doi:10.1098/rsos.160477/rivista:Royal society open science/anno:2016/pagina_da:/pagina_a:/inter
Date: 
2016
Resource Identifier: 
http://www.cnr.it/prodotto/i/366186
https://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160477
info:doi:10.1098/rsos.160477
Language: 
Eng